Memos
-
news
cocklebur blog
Archives
- December 2008 (6)
- November 2008 (17)
- October 2008 (30)
- September 2008 (21)
- August 2008 (30)
- July 2008 (26)
- June 2008 (24)
- May 2008 (25)
- April 2008 (23)
- March 2008 (26)
- February 2008 (31)
- January 2008 (19)
- December 2007 (1)
- November 2007 (4)
- October 2007 (9)
- September 2007 (7)
- August 2007 (5)
- July 2007 (4)
- June 2007 (14)
- May 2007 (30)
- April 2007 (16)
- March 2007 (12)
- February 2007 (18)
- January 2007 (13)
- December 2006 (13)
- November 2006 (5)
- October 2006 (11)
- September 2006 (6)
- August 2006 (1)
- July 2006 (1)
- June 2006 (9)
- May 2006 (20)
- April 2006 (16)
- March 2006 (12)
- February 2006 (9)
- January 2006 (4)
- December 2005 (4)
- October 2005 (2)
- September 2005 (2)
- August 2005 (1)
- July 2005 (5)
- June 2005 (4)
- May 2005 (1)
- April 2005 (3)
- November 2004 (6)
- May 2003 (1)
- April 2003 (2)
- March 2003 (2)
- 0 (1)
-
Recent Comments
- Palmetto Conservative on the bcs needs to go, but not with gov’t intervention
- your voter on the bcs needs to go, but not with gov’t intervention
- Palmetto Conservative on Are these workers here legally?
- Mike on Are these workers here legally?
- vin b on cockfight, rabies, junk car, frigidaire bust
- Hannah on p&c: Sanford’s plan to kill income taxes
- Palmetto Conservative on p&c: Sanford’s plan to kill income taxes
- John Warner on p&c: Sanford’s plan to kill income taxes
- John Warner on p&c: Sanford’s plan to kill income taxes
- Ted Nugent on p&c: Sanford’s plan to kill income taxes
- Palmetto Conservative on p&c: Sanford’s plan to kill income taxes
- Hannah on p&c: Sanford’s plan to kill income taxes
- Gene on p&c: Sanford’s plan to kill income taxes
- Palmetto Conservative on p&c: Sanford’s plan to kill income taxes
- Gene on p&c: Sanford’s plan to kill income taxes
tys (told you so)
Since the beginning, I’ve been telling ya’ll we’ve got to quit spending and making obligations that we can’t afford in the future. I began this blog in 2005 after first being elected. I quickly learned of the overflow of cash comming into the coffers of the state. Instead of spending every penny that come’s in, why not build up trust funds and make one time improvements on our roads?
It’s not a revenue problem, it is a spending problem as I have been telling you this: Here05.04.17, Here05.06.17, Here05.12.14, Here06.21.06,
Here06.02.09, Here06.02.08, Here06.04.30, Here06.05.18, Here06.05.12, Here06.06.05, Here06.12.07, Here07.01.28, Here07.03.15, Here07.04.30, Here07.04.27, Here07.04.26, Here07.04.24, Here07.04.24, Here07.04.21, Here07.04.12, Here07.05.20, Here07.06.21, Here07.06.06, Here07.08.31, Here07.10.19, Here07.11.08, Here08.01.31, Here08.01.09, Here08.02.20, Here08.02.19, Here08.02.14, Here08.03.26, Here08.03.20, Here08.03.13, Here08.04.30, Here08.04.16, Here08.04.15, Here08.04.10, Here08.04.09, Here08.04.08, Here08.04.04, Here08.05.27, Here08.05.20, Here08.06.19, Here08.06.09, Here08.06.05, and Here08.07.29,
Tax revenue down, comptroller says from the Charleston Post and Courier
COLUMBIA — South Carolina Comptroller General Richard Eckstrom said Thursday that tax collections fell by as much as 3 percent in July.
Eckstrom said he expects the state’s financial leaders on Tuesday will set aside a state reserve account to head off future shortfalls from a weak economy. And he said he expects the state will set aside money from agency budgets.
Eckstrom said data he reviewed showed that state income tax refunds in July increased by about $27 million from year-ago levels.
August 11th, 2008 at 6:21 am
[...] Sen. Kevin Bryant: blog from the backbench | tys (told you so) [...]
August 11th, 2008 at 7:51 pm
Senator Bryant,
Our State roads and bridges are in desperate need of repair and maintenance. We cannot hold them hostage to promises of cutting spending, which never materialize. We need to tax gasoline based on a percentage of the sales price, and we need to dedicate the revenue to upgrading our infrastructure. It requires political courage to do so. However, it is the only reasonable, realistic solution.
August 12th, 2008 at 3:27 pm
Art, how about the reasonable, realistic solution of putting some of the new $3b in revenue since 2003 into roads and bridges?
Instead, the General Assembly spends hundreds and hundreds of millions of dollars on frog jumps and local armory buildings.
$7.1b a year is plenty. The government doesn’t need more of our money, but that won’t stop them from trying to take it.
August 12th, 2008 at 5:02 pm
Exactly.
Taxes go up = economy goes down…that’s not the way to go.
Your exactly right that the GOV needs to make more money than they spend.
August 12th, 2008 at 6:12 pm
Palmetto Conservative,
Since my first day in America 40 years ago, I heard about government waste and inefficiency. Obviously, there is no cure to this problem; it is the nature of the beast. However, some of our basic services as education, justice system, and infrastructure cannot be put on hold, while we are looking for magical solutions to eternal challenges.
We need dedicated revenues to essential services, while we attempt to better manage government finances.
August 12th, 2008 at 7:53 pm
Art, couldn’t agree more. So, I say again, when revenues go up by the hundreds of millions, put some dedicated money in the budget for roads. The General Assembly, instead of doing that, keeps debating a new fuel tax. It’s not about our pockets, it’s about their priorities.
August 13th, 2008 at 12:32 pm
Palmetto Conservative,
Financing the upgrading of our roads and bridges should rely on a reasonable percentage of the sales of fuel, and this revenue should be protected from the political war surrounding other state revenues. However, if we achieve a surplus in the state general fund, the additional money can be dedicated to a reserve fund, to cover the inevitable coming deficit years.