first radio ad/anderson independent’s round about response
This 30 second spot was up on a few stations last week.
Evidently, the editors at the Anderson Independent don’t appreciate our message on family values. While copying the State Newspaper
in an editorial about women in government, they inferred that women in SC district 3 aren’t well represented. Incidentally, my wife and daughter (and an unknown amount of unborn baby girls) disagree with the sentiment.
It says:
…”That there is such a disparity in representation when compared to the state’s population should be cause for concern. Particularly when there are lawmakers who have exhibited such a lack of respect for health and reproductive rights for women, including our own Sen. Kevin Bryant, R-Anderson, who was behind the Senate measure to force anyone seeking an abortion to view an ultrasound prior to the procedure.
It was the “requirement,” the presumption that any woman seeking an abortion hasn’t given it more thought than any man can ever imagine, that gave us pause.”
At least they could have mentioned that the outgoing ladies of the Senate, Sen. Catherine Ceips (she was in the House last year) & Sen. Linda Short voted for the bill.
June 30th, 2008 at 2:12 pm
The Independent Mail should be ashamed of themselves. This is one of the many reasons, I cancelled my subscription. Plus, they are nothing more than a “cut and Paste” newspaper.
They have no idea what the general public really think. You would think that people cancelling their subscriptions would make them pause to think, what is wrong?
I would not give them a second thought. Remember anyone they endorse (whether it be really endorse or a backdoor endorsement) loses! They have a terrible record in predicting elections.
Their arrogance and liberal activism will lead to a further downfall of the Anderson Insufficient.
July 25th, 2008 at 8:24 pm
Keep it up and don’t back down from that kool aid drinking crowd at the hospital.