Memos
-
news
cocklebur blog
Archives
- December 2008 (6)
- November 2008 (17)
- October 2008 (30)
- September 2008 (21)
- August 2008 (30)
- July 2008 (26)
- June 2008 (24)
- May 2008 (25)
- April 2008 (23)
- March 2008 (26)
- February 2008 (31)
- January 2008 (19)
- December 2007 (1)
- November 2007 (4)
- October 2007 (9)
- September 2007 (7)
- August 2007 (5)
- July 2007 (4)
- June 2007 (14)
- May 2007 (30)
- April 2007 (16)
- March 2007 (12)
- February 2007 (18)
- January 2007 (13)
- December 2006 (13)
- November 2006 (5)
- October 2006 (11)
- September 2006 (6)
- August 2006 (1)
- July 2006 (1)
- June 2006 (9)
- May 2006 (20)
- April 2006 (16)
- March 2006 (12)
- February 2006 (9)
- January 2006 (4)
- December 2005 (4)
- October 2005 (2)
- September 2005 (2)
- August 2005 (1)
- July 2005 (5)
- June 2005 (4)
- May 2005 (1)
- April 2005 (3)
- November 2004 (6)
- May 2003 (1)
- April 2003 (2)
- March 2003 (2)
- 0 (1)
-
Recent Comments
- Palmetto Conservative on the bcs needs to go, but not with gov’t intervention
- your voter on the bcs needs to go, but not with gov’t intervention
- Palmetto Conservative on Are these workers here legally?
- Mike on Are these workers here legally?
- vin b on cockfight, rabies, junk car, frigidaire bust
- Hannah on p&c: Sanford’s plan to kill income taxes
- Palmetto Conservative on p&c: Sanford’s plan to kill income taxes
- John Warner on p&c: Sanford’s plan to kill income taxes
- John Warner on p&c: Sanford’s plan to kill income taxes
- Ted Nugent on p&c: Sanford’s plan to kill income taxes
- Palmetto Conservative on p&c: Sanford’s plan to kill income taxes
- Hannah on p&c: Sanford’s plan to kill income taxes
- Gene on p&c: Sanford’s plan to kill income taxes
- Palmetto Conservative on p&c: Sanford’s plan to kill income taxes
- Gene on p&c: Sanford’s plan to kill income taxes
open enrollment offers very few choices
.jpg)
H. 3124 is Jim Rex’s plan for open enrollment. I agree with the concept, but have a problem with the notion that this is being referred to as a school choice plan. Today, we considered an amendment to expand the options of children in a failing school. this amendment would offer a voucher to the child that meets the following criteria. 1-the child is below the 200% poverty level 2-the child is currently enrolled in a failing school & 3-the child has been denied access to seat in a passing school. Unfortunately, the amendment failed. The bill’s current status is this: A child trapped in a failing school may be granted access to a passing public school. This is an infinitesimal baby step in the right direction. Unfortunately, children will have to wait for meaningful school choice.
Here is a misleading portion of the bill:
(B) In establishing these programs, it is the objective of the General Assembly to make the South Carolina public school system the most choice-driven public school system in the nation by increasing student participation in and student access to public school educational opportunities both within and outside of their resident school district, regardless of where they may live or their socioeconomic status. It is therefore the intent of the General Assembly that this chapter be construed broadly to maximize parental choice options and student access to public school educational opportunities that are now not available to their children.
May 31st, 2007 at 1:08 am
You could get a Model A in 1920 in any color as long as it is black!!!!
June 1st, 2007 at 2:53 pm
Kevin, you sound suprised that a leftie would subvert school choice after the record of subverting and perverting “No Child Left Behind”.
Remember, the left is progressive in name only.