Memos
-
news
cocklebur blog
Archives
- November 2008 (11)
- October 2008 (30)
- September 2008 (21)
- August 2008 (30)
- July 2008 (26)
- June 2008 (24)
- May 2008 (25)
- April 2008 (23)
- March 2008 (26)
- February 2008 (31)
- January 2008 (19)
- December 2007 (1)
- November 2007 (4)
- October 2007 (9)
- September 2007 (7)
- August 2007 (5)
- July 2007 (4)
- June 2007 (14)
- May 2007 (30)
- April 2007 (16)
- March 2007 (12)
- February 2007 (18)
- January 2007 (13)
- December 2006 (13)
- November 2006 (5)
- October 2006 (11)
- September 2006 (6)
- August 2006 (1)
- July 2006 (1)
- June 2006 (9)
- May 2006 (20)
- April 2006 (16)
- March 2006 (12)
- February 2006 (9)
- January 2006 (4)
- December 2005 (4)
- October 2005 (2)
- September 2005 (2)
- August 2005 (1)
- July 2005 (5)
- June 2005 (4)
- May 2005 (1)
- April 2005 (3)
- November 2004 (6)
- May 2003 (1)
- April 2003 (2)
- March 2003 (2)
- 0 (1)
-
Recent Comments
- Sullyman on standing by is not an option by Jose F. Garcia
- Sullyman on standing by is not an option by Jose F. Garcia
- Sullyman on Don’t blame me, I voted for Sarah bumper stickers!
- Sullyman on standing by is not an option by Jose F. Garcia
- The Dude on Don’t blame me, I voted for Sarah bumper stickers!
- Sullyman on Don’t blame me, I voted for Sarah bumper stickers!
- Sullyman on Don’t blame me, I voted for Sarah bumper stickers!
- Sullyman on Don’t blame me, I voted for Sarah bumper stickers!
- Art Kaldas on standing by is not an option by Jose F. Garcia
- The Dude on Don’t blame me, I voted for Sarah bumper stickers!
- The Dude on Don’t blame me, I voted for Sarah bumper stickers!
- Palmetto Conservative on Don’t blame me, I voted for Sarah bumper stickers!
- The Dude on Don’t blame me, I voted for Sarah bumper stickers!
- Palmetto Conservative on Don’t blame me, I voted for Sarah bumper stickers!
- The Dude on Don’t blame me, I voted for Sarah bumper stickers!
S. 84 Ultrasound bill moves forward
Thursday morning (04.12.07) the Medical Affairs sub committee unanimously reported out an amended version of S. 84. The amendment contains aggressive language to inform patients of their right to have and view and ultrasound, but falls short of forcing patients to view the child in the womb. I’m confident this change will satisfy the concerns of the attorney general, and those calling for exceptions, yet the spirit of the legislation remains.
Strengthening the bill is a requirement for clinics to give patients a list of facilities that offer free ultrasounds. Serving with me on the sub-committee are: Sen. Linda Short (D-Chester), Sen. Mike Fair (R-Greenville), Sen. Brad Hutto (D- Orangeburg), & Sen. Danny Verdin (R- Laurens).
Sen. Chip Camsen (R-Charleston) weighed in on S. 84 in an editorial by the Post & Courier: “ultrasound technology has probably done more to persuade people on the issue of abortion than any number of metaphysical dissertations. I don’t want to take our most powerful tool and make it the opponents’ most powerful tool,” he said.
For those of us that don’t use big words like my superior good friend from Mt. Pleasant click here: metaphysical & dissertations
The full Medical Affairs Committee will consider S. 84 next week. I’ll be in touch!
April 17th, 2007 at 6:40 am
thank you for talking straight to us without trying talk over our head with big words.
April 17th, 2007 at 6:40 am
thank you for talking straight to us without trying talk over our head with big words.
April 17th, 2007 at 6:41 am
the image bill looks good to me
April 17th, 2007 at 6:41 am
the image bill looks good to me
May 2nd, 2007 at 3:47 am
We’ve got 2 schools of thought. I respect the pro-life national attorneys on both sides of this strategy:
1-an aggressive test case for the courts to hold up for several years.
2-a safe bill (Senate version) that will go into effect soon with little or no court cases.