07
Oct
Nov. 7 Ballot Referenda
Below are the 7 items that will appear on the Nov. 7th ballot. If you would like to see the full wording of the questions and the official explanation, go to: www.kevinbryantreferendum.blogspot.com
Question 1 Defines marriage as one man and one woman (I’ll vote yes)
Question 2a Allows for the Senate to reorganize before January (I’ll vote yes)
Question 2b Allows for one legislative body to meet without the other (I’ll vote yes)
Question 3a Expands Retirement System Investments (I’ll vote yes)
Question 3b Abolishes Investment Panel (I’ll vote yes)
Question 4 Assessment Cap (I’ll vote yes)
Question 5 Eminent Domain (I’ll vote yes)
(some have explained that referenda is more appropriate than referendums)
October 9th, 2006 at 1:47 am
a blogger on the independent mail said described you as Kevin “yes Sanford” Bryant very well.
October 9th, 2006 at 1:47 am
a blogger on the independent mail said described you as Kevin “yes Sanford” Bryant very well.
October 9th, 2006 at 7:33 pm
If “yes” to Sanford means “yes” to less government and more personal independence, then I pronounce Senator Bryant guilty as charged. Those who want more “no” to Sanford simply need to convince voters that govenrment is the solution to their problems. But, you’re going to have to work pretty hard, they’ve already been fooled by you once.
October 9th, 2006 at 7:33 pm
If “yes” to Sanford means “yes” to less government and more personal independence, then I pronounce Senator Bryant guilty as charged. Those who want more “no” to Sanford simply need to convince voters that govenrment is the solution to their problems. But, you’re going to have to work pretty hard, they’ve already been fooled by you once.
October 16th, 2006 at 1:31 pm
Senator, you match Charelston County GOP’s endorsement of all of the amendments.
October 16th, 2006 at 1:31 pm
Senator, you match Charelston County GOP’s endorsement of all of the amendments.
October 17th, 2006 at 5:26 am
referenda
October 17th, 2006 at 5:26 am
referenda
October 17th, 2006 at 1:40 pm
Is plural referendum referenda or referendums? Remember I count pills at my day job.
October 17th, 2006 at 1:40 pm
Is plural referendum referenda or referendums? Remember I count pills at my day job.
October 17th, 2006 at 3:09 pm
It can be both, actually, I was just giving you a hard time.
October 17th, 2006 at 3:09 pm
It can be both, actually, I was just giving you a hard time.
October 18th, 2006 at 12:22 am
If you’re going for strict Latin grammar referenda. Referendum’s is gramatically correct as a posessive, though referendums passes muster within the modern dumbed down American English.
If you took Chem 530 from Bob Cargill, in his day at USC, you didn’t get away without the Latin grammar lesson, as indiscriminate usage of spectra and spectrum were a pet peeve of the esteemed “organiker”.
October 18th, 2006 at 12:22 am
If you’re going for strict Latin grammar referenda. Referendum’s is gramatically correct as a posessive, though referendums passes muster within the modern dumbed down American English.
If you took Chem 530 from Bob Cargill, in his day at USC, you didn’t get away without the Latin grammar lesson, as indiscriminate usage of spectra and spectrum were a pet peeve of the esteemed “organiker”.
October 18th, 2006 at 12:42 am
Ya’ll win, it is now referenda! BTW I’m a UGA Dawg, so I didn’t get to know Prof. Cargill.