Memos
-
news
cocklebur blog
Archives
- December 2008 (6)
- November 2008 (17)
- October 2008 (30)
- September 2008 (21)
- August 2008 (30)
- July 2008 (26)
- June 2008 (24)
- May 2008 (25)
- April 2008 (23)
- March 2008 (26)
- February 2008 (31)
- January 2008 (19)
- December 2007 (1)
- November 2007 (4)
- October 2007 (9)
- September 2007 (7)
- August 2007 (5)
- July 2007 (4)
- June 2007 (14)
- May 2007 (30)
- April 2007 (16)
- March 2007 (12)
- February 2007 (18)
- January 2007 (13)
- December 2006 (13)
- November 2006 (5)
- October 2006 (11)
- September 2006 (6)
- August 2006 (1)
- July 2006 (1)
- June 2006 (9)
- May 2006 (20)
- April 2006 (16)
- March 2006 (12)
- February 2006 (9)
- January 2006 (4)
- December 2005 (4)
- October 2005 (2)
- September 2005 (2)
- August 2005 (1)
- July 2005 (5)
- June 2005 (4)
- May 2005 (1)
- April 2005 (3)
- November 2004 (6)
- May 2003 (1)
- April 2003 (2)
- March 2003 (2)
- 0 (1)
-
Recent Comments
- Palmetto Conservative on the bcs needs to go, but not with gov’t intervention
- your voter on the bcs needs to go, but not with gov’t intervention
- Palmetto Conservative on Are these workers here legally?
- Mike on Are these workers here legally?
- vin b on cockfight, rabies, junk car, frigidaire bust
- Hannah on p&c: Sanford’s plan to kill income taxes
- Palmetto Conservative on p&c: Sanford’s plan to kill income taxes
- John Warner on p&c: Sanford’s plan to kill income taxes
- John Warner on p&c: Sanford’s plan to kill income taxes
- Ted Nugent on p&c: Sanford’s plan to kill income taxes
- Palmetto Conservative on p&c: Sanford’s plan to kill income taxes
- Hannah on p&c: Sanford’s plan to kill income taxes
- Gene on p&c: Sanford’s plan to kill income taxes
- Palmetto Conservative on p&c: Sanford’s plan to kill income taxes
- Gene on p&c: Sanford’s plan to kill income taxes
Mileage Cap Proposal
Today’s topic, set for special order, is S. 969. This is a mileage cap proposal. It basically does three things:
1>adds language to the constitution defining the reasons for a potential tax increase and requiring counties to enumerate them on the ballot. They include: a deficiency in the preceding year, any catastrophic event outside the control of the governing body, or compliance with a court order or decree.
2>limits the ability of school districts to increase mileage to the equivalent of the most recent three-year rolling average of personal income growth as determined by the US Department of Commerce.
3>limits all other jurisdiction to the above formula unless an ordinance passed by the governing body is approved by the voters at a general election.
Unfortunately, current and future bonded indebtedness, for all jurisdictions, is excluded from these caps. This raises two obvious questions. First, why would we limit mileage increases for operations but not buildings? Shouldn’t voters have the right to decide if their local government should build buildings? Second, if we leave capital bonds unregulated, does this perpetuate the possibility of every county in South Carolina auditing the Greenville Plan, whereby those taxpayers assumed over $1 billion in bonded debt without even as much as a chance to vote on it? There are amendments addressing these. Will they pass?
This is a debate for taxpayers to watch. Let me know what you think.
March 18th, 2006 at 5:42 am
I have a quick, simple idea that can be put into use throughout the state to save money. As of 2000, Anderson School District 2, which serves the tiny towns of Belton and Honea Path, paid the District Administrator a handsome sum of $109,000 per year. Anderson County has 5 school districts. Greenville County, obviously one of the largest in the state, has 1 unified school district. Just think about the savings if the law required each county to have 1 unified school district.
March 18th, 2006 at 2:45 pm
I have a quick, simple idea that can be put into use throughout the state to save money. As of 2000, Anderson School District 2, which serves the tiny towns of Belton and Honea Path, paid the District Administrator a handsome sum of $109,000 per year. Anderson County has 5 school districts. Greenville County, obviously one of the largest in the state, has 1 unified school district. Just think about the savings if the law required each county to have 1 unified school district.
March 18th, 2006 at 3:08 pm
I was asked to sit on a School District Size Study Committee this summer. The appointment was made by Sen. McConnell, the Senate President Pro Tempore.
Our findings where this:
1-very large districts were inefficient
2-very small districts were inefficient
According to the conclusions of the committee, Anderson County would best be served with 2 districts.
March 18th, 2006 at 3:08 pm
I was asked to sit on a School District Size Study Committee this summer. The appointment was made by Sen. McConnell, the Senate President Pro Tempore.
Our findings where this:
1-very large districts were inefficient
2-very small districts were inefficient
According to the conclusions of the committee, Anderson County would best be served with 2 districts.