Memos
-
news
cocklebur blog
Archives
- November 2008 (11)
- October 2008 (30)
- September 2008 (21)
- August 2008 (30)
- July 2008 (26)
- June 2008 (24)
- May 2008 (25)
- April 2008 (23)
- March 2008 (26)
- February 2008 (31)
- January 2008 (19)
- December 2007 (1)
- November 2007 (4)
- October 2007 (9)
- September 2007 (7)
- August 2007 (5)
- July 2007 (4)
- June 2007 (14)
- May 2007 (30)
- April 2007 (16)
- March 2007 (12)
- February 2007 (18)
- January 2007 (13)
- December 2006 (13)
- November 2006 (5)
- October 2006 (11)
- September 2006 (6)
- August 2006 (1)
- July 2006 (1)
- June 2006 (9)
- May 2006 (20)
- April 2006 (16)
- March 2006 (12)
- February 2006 (9)
- January 2006 (4)
- December 2005 (4)
- October 2005 (2)
- September 2005 (2)
- August 2005 (1)
- July 2005 (5)
- June 2005 (4)
- May 2005 (1)
- April 2005 (3)
- November 2004 (6)
- May 2003 (1)
- April 2003 (2)
- March 2003 (2)
- 0 (1)
-
Recent Comments
- Sullyman on Don’t blame me, I voted for Sarah bumper stickers!
- Sullyman on Don’t blame me, I voted for Sarah bumper stickers!
- Sullyman on Don’t blame me, I voted for Sarah bumper stickers!
- Art Kaldas on standing by is not an option by Jose F. Garcia
- The Dude on Don’t blame me, I voted for Sarah bumper stickers!
- The Dude on Don’t blame me, I voted for Sarah bumper stickers!
- Palmetto Conservative on Don’t blame me, I voted for Sarah bumper stickers!
- The Dude on Don’t blame me, I voted for Sarah bumper stickers!
- Palmetto Conservative on Don’t blame me, I voted for Sarah bumper stickers!
- The Dude on Don’t blame me, I voted for Sarah bumper stickers!
- Palmetto Conservative on Don’t blame me, I voted for Sarah bumper stickers!
- The Dude on Don’t blame me, I voted for Sarah bumper stickers!
- Sullyman on Don’t blame me, I voted for Sarah bumper stickers!
- Palmetto Conservative on Don’t blame me, I voted for Sarah bumper stickers!
- Sullyman on Don’t blame me, I voted for Sarah bumper stickers!
02
Feb
Eminent Domain S. 1038
Next week we’ll have the first chance to discuss eminent domain on the floor. The bill, S. 1038, strengthens South Carolina’s strictures on the use of eminent domain. The salient part of this bill is, “A mere public purpose or public benefit, including, but not limited to, the purpose or benefit of economic development, does not constitute the requisite public use for property to be condemned by eminent domain.”
This eliminates the possibility of a situation such as that in Connecticut where the town took private property and gave it to a developer because, they said, the redevelopment would serve the public good.
I don’t imagine that even the strongest proponents of big government will object to this, but you never know.
February 4th, 2006 at 3:03 pm
Senator Bryant, you should be commended for opening yourself to the public. It is great to read the issues that you are focusing on and some of the things happening in the Senate.
We understand that you received a little heat for your Charter School post.
Keep up the great work!
February 4th, 2006 at 8:37 pm
Senator Bryant, you should be commended for opening yourself to the public. It is great to read the issues that you are focusing on and some of the things happening in the Senate.
We understand that you received a little heat for your Charter School post.
Keep up the great work!
February 7th, 2006 at 2:35 pm
Sen. Bryant, just wanted to commend you on your blog. Maybe you can get my dad Sen. Reese to do one, haha I don’t think my dad even knows how to turn a computer on. By the way, are you a Clemson fan?
February 8th, 2006 at 2:16 am
Sen. Bryant, just wanted to commend you on your blog. Maybe you can get my dad Sen. Reese to do one, haha I don’t think my dad even knows how to turn a computer on. By the way, are you a Clemson fan?
February 8th, 2006 at 2:33 am
Michael, Thanks for your post. Maybe I need to work out a deal…computer help for donuts!
February 8th, 2006 at 2:33 am
Michael, Thanks for your post. Maybe I need to work out a deal…computer help for donuts!